Skip to content

SIRS, Sepsis and Shock Module

SHARE VIA:

TopicSIRS, Sepsis and Shock
AuthorMichelle Alisio
Duration2 hours
Facilitator levelSenior trainee and above
Learner levelAnyone who sees paediatric patients
Equipment requiredCrunchie bars (x3), tongue depressors (x6), sleek tape, IO drill with needles (IO needles and 18 or 22G LP needles), saline flush, 3-way tap and giving set, gauze, umbilical clamp, micropore.
  • Basics: (5 mins)
  • Main session: (4 x 15 minutes) case discussions covering grey areas, diagnostic dilemmas; advanced management and escalation
  • Quiz: (10 mins) covering key points and evidence
  • Practical Procedure: (30min)
  • Infographic sharing: (5 mins) 5 take home learning points

Pre-Reading For Learners

Expectation is for the learners to have read the basic pathophysiology links and some
(not all) of the rest of the links:

Sepsis/Shock Pathophysiology (video 10 minutes)
St Emlyns Blog: Paediatric Sepsis (20 minutes)
Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic
shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children
(lengthy) OR DFTB summary (10min)
RCEMlearning: Recognising Paediatric Sepsis (15 minutes)
Paediatrics for Primary Care: Sepsis (10 minutes)
DFTB: FEAST trial analysis (10 minutes)


Podcasts

Ideally, the learners should have listened to these podcasts too:

PEM Playbook: Approach to Shock (40 minutes)
DFTB: Fluid Assessment in Sepsis (20 minutes)


Practical Procedure

OpenPediatrics: Placement of an Intraosseous (IO) Line (video 23 minutes)
PEM Playbook: Paediatric Vascular Access

SIRS, Sepsis and Shock (from Research Gate 2018)

Systemic inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) is an inflammatory state affecting the whole body because of a dysregulated host response between both pro- and anti-inflammatory processes. It can result from infectious and non-infectious causes, the latter which include autoimmune conditions, trauma, burns and anaphylaxis to name a few.

SIRS is the beginning phase of an inflammatory cascade of events, resulting in organ dysfunction, shock and ultimately multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) if left untreated. It is clinically recognised by 4 parameters. To fulfil SIRS criteria in Paediatrics, two of the following need to be met where one of which must be abnormal temperature or leucocyte count.

SIRS represents a whole organism response to a variety of quite different immune challenges. The cells responsible are mononuclear leukocytes, platelets and polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMN) which release cytokines. These cytokines are soluble, low molecular weight glycoproteins which act as inflammatory mediators to regulate both innate and specific immune responses.

At low concentration, these cytokines have only paracrine effect but at higher concentration these have endocrine effect and act systemically. Tissue Necrosis Factorα (TNF) and Interleukin 1 (IL-1) are the first cytokines to be released within 1 hour of an insult and cause fever, release stress hormones and cleave the Nuclear Factor Kappa B (NFκB) inhibitor. Below is a diagram of the SIRS cascade.

Pathophysiology of SIRS showing homeostatic imbalance in favour of pro- inflammatory state leading to the development of SIRS.

The changes involved in the process are basically responsible for uncontrolled systemic vasodilatation, decreased peripheral vascular resistance and hypotension, poor tissue perfusion, third space loss, lactic acidosis and hemodynamic instability which may be refractory to volume and inotropic support.

There is rise in energy demands, increased oxygen consumption, increased carbon dioxide production with metabolic acidosis, increased gluconeogenesis, lipolysis and aerobic glycolysis which are responsible for severe catabolic state and refractory to exogenous protein supplementation. Thus, pro- inflammatory state, is responsible for tachycardia, tachypnoea, hyperpyrexia or hypothermia, hypotension, oliguria, leucocytosis / leucopaenia, narrowed pulse and increased minute ventilation which are included in the diagnostic criteria for SIRS.

SIRS benefits:

Easy to use at the bedside, does not require sophisticated equipment or expertise, quick.

SIRS problems:

SIRS criteria have a poor ability to differentiate between self-limiting viral infections and sepsis. We send approximately 85% of children that meet SIRS criteria for sepsis home from the Paediatric Emergency Department (PED) without antibiotics. Meeting SIRS criteria is common in the PED.

Conversely, SIRS criteria lack specificity to identify children with infection at substantially higher risk of mortality. 30% of children admitted to ICU after being diagnosed by a clinician as septic do not meet the SIRS criteria for sepsis.

SIRS was built upon a foundation of basic clinical and laboratory abnormalities that were readily available in almost all clinical settings. SIRS criteria are non-specific and must be interpreted carefully within the clinical context and possibly be used as an early marker of severe or critical illness.

SIRS with a suspected source of infection is termed sepsis. Sepsis with one or more end-organ failure was severe sepsis, and with hemodynamic instability despite intravascular volume repletion is called septic shock. Regardless of the terms used together they represent a physiologic continuum with progressively worsening balance between pro and anti-inflammatory responses of the body.

Damian Roland uses the Sepsis spectrum traffic light analogy to highlight the challenges of recognising sepsis in children.

Read more about it here: http://rolobotrambles.com/sepsisspectrum/

Sepsis definition:

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that is challenging to diagnose early and accurately in children. Sepsis has complex pathophysiology causing a dysregulated inflammatory response due to infection resulting in organ dysfunction. Because sepsis has a varied and nonspecific clinical presentation, affecting heterogeneous groups of people; a simple and objective definition is not easy.

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score proposed for defining sepsis in adults has not been validated for children. Performance of the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD-2), which is the closest to the SOFA score applied in adults, has not been prospectively validated in children with sepsis admitted to the paediatric ICU and is not an instrument used in emergency services and hospitalisation units, where there are many children with sepsis.

The recent Surviving Sepsis Campaign approach essentially divides children into those needing antibiotics within 3 hours (where sepsis is possible and maybe developing but the child isn’t shocked and those that need antibiotics within one hour who have objective signs of organ dysfunction and shock. This approach hasn’t been universally adopted and for the purpose of training this guide utilises the one hour approach for all those children felt to have sepsis.

Zach’s mum is very worried about her 3-week old son. This is her first child. The pregnancy and birth were uncomplicated, except her ‘water’ broke early before she delivered. She said Zach hadn’t breastfed well these last 2 days and is more sleepy than usual today. He has no diarrhoea or vomiting and he feels hot to touch but she doesn’t have a thermometer at home. On general appearance Zach is lethargic, HR 165, and his skin is mottled.

His glucose is 1.9 mmol/L and you notice a subtle twitching of his limbs. The team recognises that Zach could have sepsis and get on with administering high flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC), getting a scalp vein, correcting the glucose and giving antibiotics all within the first hour.

  1. What is the most likely organism? In this age group, what other organisms would you consider in your differential and what first line antibiotics should you administer?
  2. How else could the team have gained vascular access quickly?
  3. Using an A,B,C,D approach; how would you have managed Zach?

What is the most likely organism? In this age group, what other organisms would you consider in your differential and what first line antibiotics should you administer?

How else could the team have gained vascular access quickly?

Using an A,B,C,D approach; how would you have managed Zach?

12-year-old Martin known with sickle cell disease comes in febrile with chest pain, a cough, leg, and back pain. The leg and back pain are always typical of his disease. Sats 97%, tachypnoeic with a respiratory rate (RR) of 30. Heart rate (HR) 140 beats per minute, normal Blood Pressure (BP) 110/80 mmHg. He receives Morphine and Fluids. His legs feel better but his chest is still bothering him. RR is still 30 and his HR still 140. You take some bloods. Hb 9.9 g/L, WCC 23.5×109/L, Platelets 143 x109/L. Chest-xray: plump looking cardiac silhouette but no pulmonary infiltrates. His BP drops to 90/60 mmHg and he is given face mask oxygen as his saturations drop to 86%.

  1. Could this be septic shock? If so, what could the likely organism/s be?
  2. Outline your approach to Martin’s management with a focus on his fluid status.
  3. Should Martin receive a fluid challenge? If so, which fluid, how much and how fast?

Could this be septic shock? If so, what could the likely organism/s be?

Outline your approach to Martin’s management with a focus on his fluid status.

Should Martin receive a fluid challenge? If so, which fluid, how much and how fast?

Johnny, an 8-month-old with chicken pox was brought to the emergency unit for persistent fever and vomiting for 3 days. The chicken pox rash had started a week prior to presentation. He had no diarrhoea, was awake, alert and able to drink from a bottle. His work of breathing was mild and he was not hypoxic.The attending team concerned with his tachycardia and prolonged capillary refill time (CRT) of 4 seconds initiated fluid therapy and the relevant antibiotics.


He received 3 x 10mL/kg fluid boluses, Ceftriaxone and Aciclovir after bloods and cultures were taken. After 2 hours Johnny was still febrile but looking better, comfortable on handling, vitals unchanged, chest x-ray had no infiltrates but there was a new concern regarding Johnny’s abdominal rash which resembled cellulitis.

  1. How would you manage the persistent fever?
  2. Is Johnny in septic shock? How reliable is a capillary refill time (CRT) in a shocked child?
  3. What additional antimicrobial therapy should Johnny receive?
  4. Should Johnny be intubated?
  5. Can children with a proven viral illness also have a concomitant severe bacterial infection (SBI)?

How would you manage the persistent fever?

Is Johnny in septic shock? How reliable is a capillary refill time (CRT) in a shocked child?

What additional antimicrobial therapy should Johnny receive?

Should Johnny be intubated?

Can children with a proven viral illness also have a concomitant severe bacterial infection (SBI)?

14-month Ellie, with no past medical history presented with a 2-day history of fever, nasal congestion and a dry cough. Her father called the ambulance when Ellie became drowsy and somewhat unresponsive for a brief period. On arrival at ED, she was clinging onto mum, tears in her eyes, her cheeks were bright red and she was very aware of everyone at her side. Her heart rate (HR) 145bpm, respiratory rate (RR) 20 breaths per minute, Temperature 38.3°C, Saturations (sats) fluctuated between 91-95% and if you looked carefully she had subtle intercostal recessions only. Her chest was otherwise clear, no organomegaly, no skin rash but her hands and feet were cool. Ellie’s mum tells you that she gave her Calpol approximately 6 hours ago. Ellie’s Paediatric Early warning score (PEWS) is 5 and is taken into majors.

The nurse is concerned about Ellie and asks you to please see her next.

OR

Despite this, you still do a septic screen and give a stat dose of ceftriaxone. Ellie really despises you now, you forgot to use emla before taking bloods. Mum is also upset because blood spilled all over the bed and her clothes. You’ve explained your management plan clearly to Ellie’s mum, she understands and continues to be a team player. Ellie’s urine dipstick is clear, you prescribe paracetamol and put her in the Clinical Decision Unit (CDU) for repeat observations, clinical review and checking of results. Her C-reactive protein (CRP) is 20 mg/L, WCC (12×109/L), she is no longer febrile, drinking like a champion and back to baseline. Her PEWS is now 1.

You do a thorough joint and ENT exam. Her ears and tonsils look normal and her throat is a little red but you decide to give her a good nasal suction. She hates it but you (and mum) are rather chuffed with the large amount of mucous you have managed to remove. You subsequently see her sats increase to 98% and her intercostal recessions have subsided. She’s keen to drink and does very well without vomiting. You think she’s more likely to have a viral infection.

Is Ellie at risk of sepsis? If so, why? What do you think is wrong with Ellie?

Would any investigations assist you with her management? What investigations and why?

Discuss how you would manage Ellie? Would you admit her?

Is Ellie at risk of sepsis? If so, why? What do you think is wrong with Ellie?

Would any investigations assist you with her management?
What investigations and why?

Discuss how you would manage Ellie? Would you admit her?

Question 1

Answer 1

Question 2

Answer 2

Question 3

Answer 3

Intraosseous (IO) Access

Aims:

  • To get a feel for the IO drill, how to assemble it and practice using it on substitute bone (Crunchie bars)
  • Practice securing the needle and attaching a fluid giving set.

When to insert an IO?

As soon as possible in septic shock and for circulatory access in cardiac arrest. Someone in the team should start getting the IO equipment in septic shock once the first IV vascular access attempt has been made. It should be ready to use when awaiting an out of hospital cardiac arrest case coming to the ED. Umbilical vein remains the preferred access in a neonate.

When not to insert an IO?

  • Proximal ipsilateral fracture
  • Ipsilateral vascular injury
  • Osteogenesis imperfecta
  • Cellulitis at the site of insertion

Where to insert an IO?

  • Proximal tibia: Anteromedial surface, 2-3 cm below the tibial tuberosity
  • Distal tibia: Proximal to the medial malleolus
  • Distal femur: Midline, 2-3 cm above the external condyle

How to insert an IO? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTxbWkHKH-M

How to secure an IO when using an 18/22G LP needle? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rer4pH3HgOc

You need gauze, umbilical cord clamp and micropore or opsite.

Complications:

  • Failure to enter the bone marrow, with extravasation or subperiosteal infusion
  • Through and through penetration of the bone
  • Osteomyelitis (rare in short term use)
  • Physeal plate injury
  • Local infection, skin necrosis, pain, compartment syndrome, fat and bone micro-emboli have all been reported but are rare

Tips:

The ‘cannulator’ should give the antibiotics.
Take a crossmatch with the second cannulation.

Please download our Facilitator and Learner guides

Author

  • Michelle Alisio is a South African trained Paediatrician working at the Evelina London Children’s Hospital as a Senior Clinical Airway and ECMO Fellow in Paediatric Intensive Care. She assisted in creating the online PEM teaching modules with Don’t Forget the Bubbles as well as helped launch their project, Skin Deep. Outside of work, she enjoys being in nature, travelling, and dancing to 80’s music. She draws inspiration from Nelson Mandela’s quote “There can be no keener revelation of a society’s soul than the way in which it treats its children.”

KEEP READING

PARDS HEADER

Paediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS)

, ,
OXY-PICU HEADER

The Oxy-PICU trial

, , ,
Copy of Trial (1)

Bubble Wrap PLUS – April ’24

PaedsPlacement HEADER

A Medical Students Guide to Paediatrics

Social admsissions

The Silent Crisis: The impact of paediatric hospital social admissions

HUS HEADER (1)

Haemolytic Uraemic Syndrome

,
Copy of Trial (1)

Bubble Wrap PLUS – March ’24

Plagiocephaly HEADER

An approach to the infant with plagiocephaly

Copy of Trial (1)

The 79th Bubble Wrap x Bristol Royal Hospital For Children

Brivudine HEADER

Brivudine for immunocompromised children with herpes zoster

NIV Status HEADER

NIV for status asthmaticus

,
Baby Check HEADER

The eight-week check

GameAware HEADER

Building Healthier Relationships With Gaming

Genitourinary symptoms in younger children

,
Conjunctivitis HEADER

Conjunctivitis in kids

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

DFTB WORLD

EXPLORE BY TOPIC