Skip to content

The fidget spinner craze – the good, the bad and the ugly


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp

Unless you have been walking around with your eyes closed, you will have noticed fidget spinners are everywhere! If not in the hands of your little patients, then in the hands of their parents. But is the hype worth it? Whilst they are being marketed as the latest tool for helping those with ADHD and autism, many are left wondering will this actually improve learning or is it just another distraction in our already hectic lives?


Firstly, one must remember that a fidget spinner is a type of fidget toy. The terms are not in fact synonymous. Rather they are just one spoke for the umbrella term:

Fidget toys/tools aren’t new. Occupational therapists have been recommending them for years. Whilst evidence behind fidget toys as a group is sparse, generally just being anecdotal, studies have shown that sensory tools such as weighted blankets and vests can produce a calming and relaxing effect in children with ADHD and Autism. When in the “right hands,” these tools can improve concentration and learning whilst reducing anxiety.


We all have a sensory “profile”. Some people prefer deep pressure touch, whereas others cannot stand touch. Some people need music to study whereas others require silence. Some people like to move and touch everything in sight, whereas for others this is incredibly frustrating. The problem is that fidget spinners have oversimplified this. It suggests that every person’s sensory profile can be managed using what is predominantly a visual sensory tool. This is obviously not the case. If the young person requires proprioceptive stimulation to stay focused (think about that person that always shakes their legs whilst they work), a spinning toy is obviously not going to fill that need. Fidget toys – whilst undeniably useful when used appropriately – need to be targeted to the young person’s needs. Strict recommendations around fidget toys are also important to highlight their role as a tool rather than a toy. Teachers should be given recommendations surrounding utilization of these tools, as well as advice that should it not be used for its intended function (e.g. should the young person throw their stress ball rather than squeeze it) it should be removed for a short period.


Finally the ugly of the fidget spinner; when used inappropriately, not only are these toys distracting to other students (as well as their teachers and parents) but they can result in injury. Whilst choking and swallowed foreign bodies are a major concern, minor head injuries and incarcerated digits have been recorded.




Fidget tools are useful when applied to the right person with the right sensory profile.


About the authors

  • Mary is an advanced trainee in General Paediatrics/Community and Developmental Paediatrics. Has called Townsville home for the last decade. Outside of work, she enjoys eating and Crossfit (one of 'those people'!)


High flow therapy – when and how?

Chest compressions in traumatic cardiac arrest

Searching for sepsis

The missing link? Children and transmission of SARS-CoV-2

Don’t Forget the Brain Busters – Round 2

An evidence summary of Paediatric COVID-19 literature


The fidget spinner craze – the good, the bad and the ugly

Parenteral Nutrition

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

1 thought on “The fidget spinner craze – the good, the bad and the ugly”



We use cookies to give you the best online experience and enable us to deliver the DFTB content you want to see. For more information, read our full privacy policy here.