Skip to content

Oral or IV antibiotics?

SHARE VIA:

There are many self-perpetuating myths when it comes to antibiotic use in children. A few that seem intuitive, and come up almost daily, include the idea that intravenous antibiotics are ‘better’, that children require lower doses than adults, and ‘longer is better’ when it comes to treatment duration.

A few key concepts can be helpful to understand why certain routes and doses of antibiotics are required:

  • Pharmacokinetics: the effect of the body on the drug – how the body absorbs, distributes, metabolizes and excretes the antibiotic
  • Pharmacodynamics: the effect of the drug on the body – how the antibiotic effects bacteria in the body 
  • Bioavailability: the amount of the antibiotic which is effectively absorbed when given orally and reaches the bloodstream

Here are some points to consider next time you need to chart antibiotics for a child.

When are intravenous antibiotics absolutely required?

  1. Speed – if there is a life (think sepsis, meningitis) or limb-threatening (eg. necrotising fasciitis) intravenous antibiotics are required as they reach peak plasma levels in seconds/minutes, rather than hours
  2. Absorption – for children with poor or unreliable oral absorption (eg. inflammatory bowel disease, short gut) intravenous antibiotics will likely be required
  3. Neonates – in general neonates are considered to have poor oral absorption, therefore antibiotics are usually given intravenously
  4. No oral options – in some cases there may be no oral option available; this is particularly relevant for highly resistant organisms such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing organisms
  5. High dose – if a very high dose of an antibiotic is required the volume of liquid required for a child to consume may be excessive, in these cases intravenous antibiotics may be required
  6. Nil per os – in children who are not able to take any oral medications (eg. bowel obstruction) intravenous antibiotics may be required; remember insertion of a nasogastric tube and NG medications may be an option particularly for younger children
  7. Worsening infection on oral antibiotics – this one can be a little tricky as factors such as wrong dose (antibiotics are commonly under-dosed in the community), wrong antibiotic, and poor compliance need to be considered, but sometimes children may require admission for intravenous antibiotics

It’s 2am on your fourth night shift in a row. Johnny is 2 years old and has osteomyelitis of his toe. He looks pretty well and doesn’t like sitting still for cannulas. Poor Johnny has marks on both hands and both elbows from recent IVs that have not gone the distance and now you have just been paged to say he has managed to remove another one. He has been being treated for 5 days and you are wondering if he really needs this IV re-siting.

How do we know how long to prescribe IV antibiotics for?

As it turns out, often we don’t. Recognising this gap in the literature a leading group of Australasian paediatric infectious disease experts have conducted a systematic review of treatment duration in 36 infectious diseases. They have used this review to create recommendations on the duration of both IV and total (IV and oral) antimicrobial treatment for each of these 36 diseases.

What are the highlights?

This will depend on your practice setting as with 36 diseases covered there really is something for everyone. Working in an emergency department, I am looking forward to wielding the recommendations that a minimum of 0 days IV treatment (i.e orals only) are required for pharyngitis, mild cases of both cellulitis and cervical lymphadenitis as well as UTIs in patients over 3 months old. The paper also adds weight to the idea that most kids with otitis media should get 48 hours to fix themselves before being hit with antibiotics. The usual cautions around immunocompromised and otherwise medically complex children apply. The paper also includes a nice box on the general principles guiding IV to oral switching of antibiotics – namely clinical stability, ability to absorb orals and the availability of an appropriate oral preparation

Who wrote these guidelines?

The guideline was written by the Australian and New Zealand Paediatric Infectious Diseases Australasian Stewardship of Antimicrobials in Paediatrics (ANZPID-ASAP) group of the Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases (ASID). This group is formed of paediatric ID specialists from all over Australia and New Zealand. The guideline is very clear about the strength of each recommendation, with some Grade A evidence in ENT, orthopaedic and urinary tract infections as well as appendicitis. Although the majority of the 36 recommendations are based on grade C and D evidence, the author list includes at least one person you would phone for an ID consult if you work at any major paediatric centre in Australia.

When can you change to oral antibiotics?

There are four general principles guiding the change from intravenous to oral antibiotics (McMullen et al.)

  • Clinical condition – note that fever alone does not need to prevent switch
  • Ability to absorb oral antibiotics
  • Availability of an appropriate oral antibiotic
  • Practical issues

The above reference gives a thorough discussion on the evidence of when to switch to oral antibiotics for a range of common paediatric infections (skin and soft tissue, urinary tract infections etc).

What other factors need to be taken into account?

Bioavailability – some drugs have excellent oral absorption, therefore there it is almost criminal to give them IV if the child can swallow them! Think metronidazole, rifampicin, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin and clindamycin (which all have good tissue penetration)

“Help – my child refuses to take oral antibiotics!” – this is a tricky one and the use of an experienced paediatric pharmacist is invaluable as there are many aids that can be used to help resilient toddlers take their medications

Why is this important?

The implications of shortening the course of intravenous antibiotics and antibiotics overall are numerous…

  • Shorter courses of antibiotics may affect antimicrobial resistance
  • Shorter inpatient stays (required unless outpatient antimicrobial therapy is available through a hospital in the home service) are associated with improved quality of life in children and their families, and money-saving for the hospital system
  • Intravenous antibiotics may be associated with line complications, pain and traumatic experiences for children

Selected references

McMullan BJ, Andresen D, Blyth CC, Avent ML, Bowen AC, Britton PN, Clark JE, Cooper CM, Curtis N, Goeman E, Hazelton B. Antibiotic duration and timing of the switch from intravenous to oral route for bacterial infections in children: systematic review and guidelines. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2016 Aug 1;16(8):e139-52.

About the authors

  • Alison Boast is a paediatric registrar in Australia, currently embarking on her PhD in bone and joint infections. She is passionate about teaching and making the world just that little bit more organized with the help of washi tape.

  • Ben Lawton is a paediatric emergency physician interested in education, retrieval medicine and simulation. Lives in Brisbane where he enjoys falling off his mountain bike and being outsmarted by his pre-teen children. @paedsem | + Ben Lawton | Ben's DFTB posts

KEEP READING

High flow therapy – when and how?

Chest compressions in traumatic cardiac arrest

Searching for sepsis

The missing link? Children and transmission of SARS-CoV-2

Don’t Forget the Brain Busters – Round 2

An evidence summary of Paediatric COVID-19 literature

Urticaria

The fidget spinner craze

Parenteral Nutrition

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

DFTB WORLD

EXPLORE BY TOPIC

We use cookies to give you the best online experience and enable us to deliver the DFTB content you want to see. For more information, read our full privacy policy here.
[cmplz-manage-consent]