Skip to content

Appendectomy or antibiotics?


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp

Appendicitis is a common diagnosis in ED, and once it is confirmed clinically or on ultrasound, the patient usually goes pretty quickly to theatre for an appendectomy. But is a course of antibiotics just as effective as taking these kids to theatre?

A recent article accepted for publication in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons (Feb 2014) investigated this question in a prospective, non-randomised trial comparing urgent appendectomy with antibiotic management of acute appendicitis in children.

Minneci PC, Sulkowski JP, Nacion KM, Mahida JB, Cooper JN, Moss RL, Deans KJ, Feasibility of a Nonoperative Management Strategy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in Children, Journal of the American College of Surgeons (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.031.

Who were the patients?

Eligible children who presented to the author’s hospital (in the USA) were:

  • 7-17 years old
  • Less than 48 hours abdo pain
  • WCC < 18 000
  • US or CT confirming non-ruptured appendicitis (appendix <1.1cm, no phlegmom, abscess or faecolith)
  • Surgical review confirming clinical appendicitis

Exclusion criteria:

  • Diffuse peritonitis
  • Positive pregnancy test
  • Chronic abdo pain

There were 77 patients in the study.

What was the intervention?

Enrolled patients could opt for surgical management or non-operative management. Of the 77 patients: 47 chose surgery and 30 chose non-operative management.

The surgical group went straight for an appendectomy, with antibiotics prior to surgery (these were discontinued post-op).

The non-operative group had:

  • Minimum 24 hours of tazocin
  • Minimum of 12 hours nil by mouth and then could start a diet if pain was improving
  • Pain relief PRN
  • Switched to oral amoxicillin once tolerating oral diet and once discharged should complete a total of 10 days antibiotics

Doesn't this seem a bit dangerous?

Patient were removed from the non-operative group if they did not show clinical improvement within 24 hours of antibiotics; or if they returned with abdo pain after discharge.

What was the follow up?

Patients were followed up for 30 days to look at outcomes which included: non-operative management; length of hospital stay; disability days; quality of life.

So what happened?

After 30 days, 27 out of the 30 patients had successful non-operative management. Of the three that failed:

  • One had an appendectomy within the first 24 hours due to failure to improve and had acute appendicitis
  • One had an appendectomy within the first 24 hours due to failure to improve and had appendicitis secondary to a tumour
  • One had an appendectomy after representation one day post-discharge and the appendix was normal

In the non-operative group, there was a longer hospital stay, but a shorter time to return to normal activity. Quality of life scores were higher at 30 days in the non-operative group.

Previously most studies on conservative management of appendicitis have been on adults, and this study in children provides some promising preliminary results (although it is on quite a small sample). The main risks from a missed appendicitis would be from a perforated appendix, and none of the patients in this study went on to have a perforated appendix within 30 days.

However, longer term issues would be: recurrent abdo pain which could have a significnt impact on the lives of these families; and also the eventual outcome re appendectomy as this would negate the benefit of the delay. The authors are aiming to follow up at 1 year so we should keep an eye out for the next article from this group of authors.

About the authors

  • Tessa Davis is a Consultant in Paediatric Emergency Medicine at the Royal London Hospital and a Senior Lecturer at Queen Mary University of London.


High flow therapy – when and how?

Chest compressions in traumatic cardiac arrest

Searching for sepsis

The missing link? Children and transmission of SARS-CoV-2

Don’t Forget the Brain Busters – Round 2

An evidence summary of Paediatric COVID-19 literature


The fidget spinner craze – the good, the bad and the ugly

Parenteral Nutrition

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.



We use cookies to give you the best online experience and enable us to deliver the DFTB content you want to see. For more information, read our full privacy policy here.