Skip to content

Tillaux fractures

SHARE VIA:

Jenny is a 14-year-old girl who was at soccer training when she had an awkward injury to her left ankle. She was running for the ball when her foot caught in a clump of grass, and she externally rotated her leg while her foot remained planted. While the pain was instantaneous, there was very little swelling. Her father has brought her in, remarking that ‘it’s probably just a sprain’. But as you call her down to the cubicle to examine her, you think there might be more to it.

Incidence

Tillaux fractures are a type of ‘transitional’ ankle fracture that occurs almost exclusively in adolescents. They occur during the unique closure pattern of the distal tibial physis, which closes over an eighteen-month period: first in the middle, then medially, and finally laterally. During the closure, this area is vulnerable to these distinctive transitional fractures: the triplane fracture and the Tillaux fracture.

These fractures account for roughly 3% of paediatric ankle fractures. They are seen more commonly in females and tend to occur at slightly different ages, depending on gender. They tend to occur later than a triplane fracture, between 12-14 years in girls and 15-18 years in boys.

Mechanism

This Salter-Harris 3 fracture occurs at the anterolateral distal tibial epiphysis. It tends to cause avulsion of the tibial fragment by the tibiofibular ligament; this strong ligament extends from the anterior aspect of the lateral distal tibial epiphysis to the anterior aspect of the fibula. The lack of a fracture through the coronal plane distinguishes this injury from that of a triplane fracture.

This injury pattern usually occurs through a combination of supination and external rotation of the foot in relation to the leg. It usually occurs through low-velocity trauma, for example, in skateboard accidents or sports with a sliding injury.

Presentation

These injuries are almost exclusively seen in adolescents. Similar to most ankle injuries, there will be a history of trauma, symptoms of pain, swelling, and an inability (or pain) to weight-bearing.

The clinical exam often reveals localised tenderness to the anterior joint line. This contrasts with a sprain, where the tenderness is usually below the joint line. The fibula prevents marked displacement.

Imaging

Do not be misled by lack of swelling – have a low threshold to image injuries, which present with an inability to weight bear (at least four steps). When requesting an ankle x-ray, AP and lateral views will be included as standard – if you have a high index of suspicion for a Tillaux fracture, ask for an oblique or ‘mortise’ view – this can improve your detection by avoiding the obstructed view through the fibula and potentially making the subtle fracture more apparent.

This injury can sometimes have an associated ipsilateral tibial shaft fracture or a proximal fibular injury. During your clinical exam, if you have illicit tenderness proximal to the ankle, include a full-length tibia/fibula x-ray with your request.

Does this injury require a CT scan? Perhaps! See the controversy section below for a more thorough explanation. The orthopaedic team generally only requires a CT scan to assist with surgical planning.

Image courtesy of Orthobullets.com
Image showing CT scan of the same fracture with >2mm displacement courtesy of Orthobullets.com

However, this injury often requires a CT scan to assist the orthopaedic team in deciding between conservative and operative management.

A study by Horn et al. showed that CT is more sensitive than plain film at detecting fractures with greater than 2mm displacement (the cut-off point adopted for operative fixation).

Treatment

These fractures are important as they involve the weight-bearing surface and can lead to significant morbidity if missed. The treatment of these injuries is not uniform—different methods and cut-offs are described in different case reports and case series. That said, the current marker for operative versus conservative treatment is the degree of displacement of the fracture fragment.

Those with < 2mm displacement can generally be treated conservatively. This usually involves an above-knee cast for up to 4 weeks (to control the rotational component) followed by either a walker boot or a below-knee cast for a further 2-4 weeks. This conservative approach has been well-documented to have a satisfactory outcome.

Those with >2mm displacement generally require intervention to ensure that the articular congruity of the joint surface is restored. Intervention can occur in different forms; some may be suitable for a closed reduction under procedural sedation (or general anaesthetic). Different reduction techniques exist; however, longitudinal traction while the knee is flexed, followed by internally rotating a maximally dorsiflexed ankle, seems to achieve greater anatomic reduction.

A review by Lurie et al. concluded those left with a residual gap of more than 2.5mm had worse functional outcomes. Therefore, post-reduction radiological confirmation should show minimal displacement (the figure of <2mm tends to be favoured in the literature); otherwise, operative intervention is required. Many orthopaedic surgeons favour CT as the post-reduction imaging modality of choice and then follow this reduction with serial radiographs to confirm maintenance of the reduction over time.

Operative intervention can involve K-wire insertion, the use of lag screws or a novel technique involving percutaneously inserted wires with arthroscopic or radiological guidance. This new technique is seen as less invasive and effective but is technically complex and demanding. If this injury presents with a neurovascular compromise or critical skin, then emergent surgery is indicated. This is, thankfully, rare.

What to tell the patient

Recovery: Both operative and conservative measures tend to require up to 8 weeks of immobilisation followed by a rehab phase. This phase will vary depending on the patient’s age. Most patients have a good outcome, with 86% having complete recovery and no sequelae. Very few will have pain or limitation of ankle movement. Late presentation and a non-anatomical reduction will increase the risk of this.

Complications

These are less common than other ankle fractures; delayed or malunion, osteonecrosis of the distal tibial epiphysis, premature growth arrest and compartment syndrome are all very rare occurrences. Early-onset arthritis can occur. Those with late presentations or missed fractures are more at risk.

Operative intervention carries the additional (albeit small) risk of physeal damage from direct pressure by blunt instruments and inadvertent damage to the superficial peroneal nerve.

Controversies

Radiological evaluation remains controversial. Plain x-rays usually identify the transitional fracture and the degree of displacement. However, CT (ideally with 3D reconstruction) is more accurate in estimating the degree of displacement and fracture separation.

Case courtesy of Dr Yasser Asiri, Radiopaedia.org. From the case rID: 64778

CT can help identify the number and position of fragments. The issue of whether CT or MRI alters treatment or prognosis when compared with plain X-rays has not been fully investigated. Limited research has been carried out on whether CT, with its greater accuracy, actually affects treatment or patient outcome. Liporace et al 2012 found that interobserver and intra-observer agreements about primary treatment plans did not differ significantly between radiography alone and radiography plus CT. This showed that the addition of CT did not actually change the impression of the degree of displacement in each case. This raises the question as to whether CT really alters outcomes despite having perceived greater benefits.

On exam, Jenny was found to have significant tenderness about her distal tibia, and an X-ray confirmed a minimally displaced Tillaux fracture.

She was placed in an above-knee backslab and referred to the orthopaedic fracture clinic.

She is left disappointed that she will miss this season’s matches, but thankfully, you didn’t misdiagnose this as a sprain!

References

Orthobullets.com/paediatrics/4028/tillaux-fractures

Wheelers textbook of Orthopaedics (updated 2015) Clifford J Wheeless Tintinnali 7th Ed

Tiefenboeck TM, Binder H, Joestil J et al. Displaced juvenile Tillaux fractures: surgical treatment and outcome. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017; 129 (5-6):169-175

Rosenbaum AJ, DiPreta JA, Uhl RL. Review of distal tibial epiphysis transitional fractures. Orthopaedics. 2012;35(12):1046-1049

Horn BD, Cristina K, Krug M, Pizzutillo PD, MacEwen GD. Radiologic evaluation of juvenile Tillaux fractures of the distal tibia. J Pediatr Orthopaedics. 2001; 21(2): 162-4

Cooperman DR, Spiegel PG, Laros GS. Tibial fractures involving the ankle in children. The so-called triplane epiphyseal fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Dec. 60 (8):1040-6

Panagopoulos A, van Niekerk L. Arthroscopic assisted reduction and fixation of a juvenile Tillaux fracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:415-417

Manderson EL, Ollivierre CO. Closed anatomic reduction of a juvenile tillaux fracture by dorsiflexion of the ankle. A case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Mar. (276):262-6.

Crawford AH Triplane and Tillaux fractres: is a 2mm residual gap acceptable. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Jun;32 Suppl1:S69-73

Schlesinger I, Wedge JH. Percutaneous reduction and fixation of displaced juvenile Tillaux fractures: a new surgical technique. J Pediatr Orthopaedics. 1993;13:389-391

Stefanich RJ, Lozman J. The juvenile fracture of Tillaux. Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res. 1986;210:219-227

Kaya A, Altay T, Ozturk H, Karapinar L. Open reduction and internal fixation in displaced juvenile Tillaux fractures. Injury 2007;38:201-205

Choudhry IK, Wall EJ, Eismann EA. Crawford AH, Wilson I. Functional outcome analysis of triplane and tillaux fractyres after closed reduction and percutaneous fixation. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34:139-43

Jennings MM, Layaway P, Schubert JM. Arthroscopic assisted fixation of juvenile intra-articular epiphyseal ankle fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg 2007;46: 376-386

Rockwood and Wilkin’s fractures in children. 6th Edition.2006

Kim JR, Song KH, Song KJ, Lee HS. Treatment outcomes of triplane and Tillaux fractures of the ankle in adolescence. Clin Orthop Surg. 2010 Mar. 2 (1):34-8

Haapamaki VV, Kiuru MJ, Koskinen SK. Ankle and foot injuries: analysis of MDCT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Sep. 183 (3):615-22

Charlton M, Costello R, Mooney JF et al. Ankle joint biomechanics following transepiphyseal screw fixation of the distal tibia. J Pediatr Orthopaedics. 2005;25: 635-640

Liporace FA, Yoon RS, Kubiak EN, Parisi DM, Koval KJ, Feldman DS, et al. Does adding computed tomography change the diagnosis and treatment of Tillaux and triplane pediatric ankle fractures?. Orthopedics. 2012 Feb 17. 35 (2):e208-12

Lurie B, Van Rysselberghe N, Pennock AT, Upsani VV. Functional outcomes of Tillaux and triplane fractures with 2-5millimetres of intra articluations gap. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102:679-686

Rapariz AJ, Avocets G, Gonzalez-Herman P, Texas et al. Distal tibial triplane fractures: long term follow up. J Pediatr Orthopaedics. 1996; 16: 113-118.

Author

  • Top marks if you can spell AND pronounce my name correctly – even my mother misspelled my name on the birth cert! Adrenaline Junkie who favours some emergency medicine on the side. Special interest in PEM and critical care. When I’m not putting stickers on kids and waving unicorn bubble wands around, I can be found out adventuring; running, cycling, kayaking and hiking. Love: sparkling water, owls, unicorns. Dislike: people spelling my name incorrectly!

    View all posts

KEEP READING

No data was found

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

DFTB WORLD

EXPLORE BY TOPIC